Integral Metaphysics - outline of my current book in progress
----------------------
The title, "Integral Metaphysics", refers to the synthesis of two topics that have grabbed my interest over the years. "Integral" (in the philosophical and spiritual context) is a poorly defined concept that refers to a universal explanation of everything in terms of an evolutionary philosophy of personal and social transformation. "Metaphysics" refers to all the big questions about the nature of life, the universe, and Reality as a whole. It pertains not just to the visible physical world, but the invisible, non-physical reality as well. "Integral Metaphysics" combines both these themes. It also describes an evolutionary transformation culminating in personal and global divinisation....
The second part of the book is called "Integral". This is about Integral philosophy, the Integral paradigm, as opposed to Integral yoga. Integral philosophy, in this context, is Exoteric. Exoteric refers to the outer, ordinary or public understanding. It is the opposite of Esoteric. "Esoteric" here refers to the "inner" mystical or occult teachings, and the subtle, transcendent, or spiritual and metaphysical dimension of being. When considering exoteric and esoteric , it is not that one is bad and the other good or "better". The exoteric provides the outer form or structure, the esoteric the inner experience of enlightenment and transformation. Both are absolutely necessary. This distinction is very important and will appear a number of times in the present work.
Integral philosophy is presented as an alternative to the two standard world views of modern society. By "worldview" I mean the overall explanations or belief-systems we use to explain the world around us. ... It might be science or it might be a particular religion and belief in God, or anything else. The two worldviews by which most people today tend to make meaning of their lives and of the universe (and everything else) are agnosticism1 and materialism, which takes its justification from the discoveries of science, and religious ideas of a supreme deity, as revealed through religious scriptures, on the other. It is argued that neither dogmatic religion nor materialism and scepticism can provide an overall explanation....
The third part of the book is called "Metaphysics." This is about the "esoteric" perspective, as opposed to the exoteric Integral movement. "Metaphysics" is a technical word from philosophy which is given many different meanings (some of which are "exoteric" and others "esoteric"), .... "Esoteric" is based on spiritual knowledge, called gnosis, and "inner" (metaphorically speaking) and occult realities. By "occult" I do not mean the sort of sensationalist nonsense about devil worship and so on propounded by strict and conservative religion and the mass media, but rather the art and science of non-mundane realities. Also described here is what is called the "perennial philosophy". This is the idea that there is a common and universal truth found in all the different philosophies and spiritual teachings.
The esoteric aspect of the Integral path builds upon but also goes beyond the "outer" theory and practice, because it includes spiritual, metaphysical, and transformative elements. By "transformative" is meant becoming something else, a metamorphosis, like a caterpillar that becomes a butterfly. Integral esoteric metaphysics and practice constitutes a spiritual philosophy and description of the universe that is able to incorporate various esoteric, occult, mystical, and spiritual teachings. Indeed, it can incorporate every possible teaching and experience.
As a concession to academia, I have also included a chapter that replies to the sceptical, agnostic, or materialistic arguments....
The fourth part of the present work, "First Philosophy", presents the foundations of metaphysics. Metaphysics is grounded in questions concerning the nature of Being or Reality. In this I take my inspiration from Aristotle's definition of theology and metaphysics, which have nothing to do with later religious interpretations. As presented in this book, "First Philosophy" is about not only to the nature of Absolute Reality, but also to the origin of everything from the Absolute Reality. This process by which creation comes about is called "emanation". Emanation means that creation is an outpouring of the Supreme. ...Causality, which is the explanation of how things come about, is explained as both "vertical" (through emanation, from the Supreme) and "horizontal" (in that everything also causes everything else, as in the Buddhist idea of "dependent origination" or karma. Causality means that everything is in a process of constant change...
The fifth part, "Being", provides a description of the nature of both individual and cosmic reality that builds on the metaphysical foundation laid out in part four, and also builds on the underlying philosophical, spiritual, occult, esoteric, and methodological premises of part three. Although Reality (capital "R") is one and indivisible, it can be viewed has including a number of branching and converging domains (or worlds, planes, aspects, states; dimensions...) or realities (small "r"). Together these constitute what is poetically known as "The Great Chain of Being" or "The Spectrum of Consciousness". Each of these small "r" realities can be experienced as the big "R" Supreme Reality, depending on where your consciousness is at (in other words, "God" or "The Absolute" or whatever you want to call Him/Her/It is not something different or separate from where you are at). And each have qualitative differences.... In the present book, eight such primary domains are described. Our familiar physical world is presented as the "outermost", the most "dense" or "gross" of the four states of the "lowest" of these primary realities.... Each reality, and each sub-reality and sub-sub-reality, has its own particular unique characteristics, phenomena, laws, and even beings. And if that sounds all too strange, then you have to read the other parts first!
But this description of Reality is still artificial, because it describes a static model. Whereas the nature of being is as dynamic, consisting of a series of processes or metamorphoses. At best then, the spectrum of being refers to a description of manifest Reality as it is now; a snapshot of consciousness. But because everything is a process of change (as described in part four), this cannot be a complete explanation. Therefore the sixth part, "Process", describes Reality in terms pf dynamic change and metamorphosis.
Here four different creation stories about how things came about are described . These might be called "grand narratives", or meaningful myths in the Jungian sense.... Rather than being contradictory, they are complementary, each different aspect of a larger multidimensional reality. .They describe the dynamic nature of physical and occult reality as process, rather than as static structures. These are Kalpas and Cycles (as described in Eastern philosophy, Jewish Kabbalah, and modern astrophysics such as the Big Bang in physical cosmology), Crisis and Restitution (as described in Gnosticism and again Kabbalah), Rounds or Dimensions (best described in the Theosophy of the Russian occultist Madame Blavatsky, and the Anthroposophy of the Austrian philosopher and clairvoyant Rudolf Steiner), and Evolution (again as in modern science) and Hypostases (a technical term for the levels of reality that make up the previously mentioned "spectrum of being").
The seventh part is called Divinisation. Many religions, and almost all spiritual teachings and yogas teach individual salvation and transcendence only, or else passively waiting for a Messiah. But both the Lurianic tradition of Kabbalah, and Integral Yoga, teach that humanity is able to participate in the transformation of the world. In Kabbalah this is only described in metaphoric and religious language, and there is also no concept of the divinisation of the body. In Sri Aurobindo's teachings it is described in a clear and practical way. This involves not just conventional Enlightenment, also spiritual stages of the evolution of consciousness beyond even enlightenment. ... By evolution is meant not just physical and biological evolution described in part five (although it is that too), but evolution on every level and aspect of the being, including spiritual and even divine Evolution. In Integral Yoga the sequence is Enlightenment and then even further Evolution, not just Evolution and then Enlightenment, as in New Age and the exoteric Integral philosophy. This is because Evolution extends beyond Enlightenment. Indeed, the most radical stages of Evolution are those that build upon and integrate Enlightenment.
-------------------------

Help




Interesting Alan, I actually agree with this concept, eventhough I lambasted Wilber and Cohen's[what I believe is a trite concept of evolutionary enlightenment].
In my theory, the theory of the Ellipse[imperfect circle] as opposed to the perfect circle, my metaphors for perfection, and imperfection of the soul; in that theory, by the way it is an entire theory of the spectrum of the structure of the soul[Atman].
After enlightenment, I describe a further [expansion] of the Atman, to the level what the Sufis call completion[Insani Kamil] which actually is a higher level than perfection. That to me is the ultimate condition of the soul, and because it literally is a change in its structure, it can be called evolutionary, but as you say, this is beyond enlightenment.
The spiritual technical term for this is Qiyama[ resurection, or expansion]
Watch by the way for my essay on Sufim, If Frank will publish it, it is finished.
I have another one called
“The Dharma of Ken Wilber”. It is kind of rough so I may not try to publish it. But then again I may. One never knows does one!
By the way your book sounds GREAT!
Best wishes
Zak
Hi Zak!
I agree, Wilber and Cohen's concepts of evolutionary spirituality are very trite in comparison to Sri Aurobindo!
I found what you say about the ascension in Sufism to states beyond enlightenemnt to be extremely interesting! I look forward to seeing your essay. I'd like to incorporate some of these Sufi themes in my book.
Sri Aurobindo associates these higher stages with the transformation and divinisation of matter.
Then there is the idea of the gross and subtle resurrection body. Henry Corbin has some interesting things to say in Spiritual Body and Celestial Earth
best wishes
alan
Alan,
I'm incredibly excited that I stumbled upon your post. I have a personal interest in Integral metaphysics, however the university I recently graduated from was heavily grounded in a continental and analytic approach (in fact, I don't think there is one professor there that even had a passing interest in integral studies). Thus I've been reading heavily on my own to better understand first and foremost a proper definition for integral philosophy, as well as its various sub-disciplines.
I would love to read any manuscripts or passing thoughts you have in the future!
I'm actually a triple major, recently graduated with my BA in philosophy, but am also pursuing psychology and sociology. The three are inherently connected, however they tend not to be taught integrally. I believe a proper integral metaphysics will help anchor the three together.
Keep writing!
Ryan
Keep building, and best wishes, my friend…
Hey Alan,
I realize this is a bit of a tangent, but I would really look forward to some kind of comprehensive comparison of Theosophy, Steiner and Gurdjieff in the book- something I have never seen attempted anywhere- it may tie into that cyclical concept of, um… evolution I guess.
Ryan, thanks for the offer! Sure, I'd love to get your feedback! Hopefully the reised first part (which is parts I and II in the overview) should be ready soon
Arachnid, I'll certainly be mentioning those three. But whereas Theosophy and Steiner are fvery similar, in terms of cyclic cosmology etc, Fourth Way is very different.
But yeah in part six i'll reconcile these different efvolutionary and cyclic cosmological ideas within the bigger picture
I just wanted to add my two bits here, I've already read the outline and once again want to say how readable, interesting and inspiring this work is. My academic days are over, but you seem to have managed to explore something that is quite complex and perhaps 'difficult' in a very real and inviting way - perhaps because your are not just theorizing, but have personal experience about what you write.
Love,
Sandra
Thanks Sandra! Yes, experience is very important, also intuition. I'm also trying to write simply - not always an easy thing!
I could echo exactly what Sandra wrote… thank you so much for sharing this work, and yourself. I get such a strange and hard-to-articuate pleasure out of works that somehow stroke the intellect and the heart, and this one certainly looks to qualify.
Ai. I wish I had the time to be one of your reviewers. For now can I just say that I'm already anticipating the day the book goes to print? I think it's going to be incredible.
Again, thank you.
Thanks for your kind words Siona :-) I agree with you about the value of books that appeal to the heart as well as the head. Yep I'm sure that Integral Metaphysics will be a best seller! :-)
(I'm also going to mention Zaadz in a later chapter of the book)
Yea Alan we are going to have a metaphysical Da vinci Code on our hands, I am sure.
Then YOU WILL BE INVITED ON INTEGRAL NAKED, NO MATTER WHAT YOU EVER WROTE, I GUARENTEE IT!
Yes it will be interesting to see how the mainstream (Wilberian) Integral movement responds to my book!